After spending the better part of a decade analyzing narrative structure and dissecting fan theories across science fiction and horror franchises, I’ve developed what some might call an occupational hazard: I can’t watch a mystery unfold without mentally cataloging what makes it work. When Stranger Things premiered in 2016, I immediately recognized something special in how the Duffer Brothers handled their central enigma. Now, having watched the franchise expand through five seasons, a stage play, and multiple comic series, I’m genuinely concerned that further prequels—particularly anything diving deeper into Hawkins Laboratory’s origins—could fundamentally undermine what made this story captivating.
The Foundation of Effective Horror: My Years of Research
My career has centered on understanding why certain stories haunt us while others fade immediately from memory. The research I’ve encountered consistently supports a counterintuitive principle: in horror and mystery narratives, less explanation creates more fear. This isn’t just theoretical—it’s borne out in studies on horror effectiveness that demonstrate how people’s imaginations invariably conjure terrors more potent than any special effect or explicit reveal.
I always point to Jaws as the textbook example. Spielberg’s mechanical shark malfunctioned constantly during filming, forcing him to suggest the threat rather than show it. That technical limitation became the film’s greatest strength. Our minds filled those gaps with something far more frightening than rubber and metal could ever be.
When I first watched Stranger Things Season 1, I recognized this same principle at work. The show introduced its supernatural elements with remarkable restraint. We didn’t immediately understand what the Upside Down was, how Eleven’s powers functioned, or what Hawkins Lab had been doing for decades. That gradual revelation created genuine suspense because the mystery felt authentically mysterious, not like a puzzle with a predetermined solution waiting to be unveiled.
How The First Shadow Changed Everything
Here’s where my concern intensifies. I attended Stranger Things: The First Shadow during its London run, and while the production values impressed me, the narrative revelations troubled me deeply from a storytelling perspective. The play pulls back the curtain on elements I believe should have remained obscured.
We learn that Dr. Brenner’s father captained the USS Eldridge and was teleported to an alternate dimension—the genesis of Brenner’s obsession with Dimension X. We discover how Brenner found Henry’s spyglass and used it to track him to Hawkins, establishing his laboratory there. Most significantly, we see how Brenner gained access to Henry through his mother Virginia and eventually used him to alter other children’s blood types, unlocking powers that allowed dimensional access.
Each revelation, from my analytical perspective, chips away at the laboratory’s menacing ambiguity. What functioned as a terrifyingly opaque government facility conducting unknowable experiments has been transformed into a documented origin story with clear motivations and methodologies. The institutional evil that made Hawkins Lab frightening wasn’t its specific experiments—it was the sense that this faceless organization had been perpetrating horrors for decades without accountability or explanation.
The Mystery Box Trap I’ve Seen Destroy Other Franchises
I’ve spent years tracking how Mystery Box storytelling, popularized by J.J. Abrams, has plagued modern franchises. I watched it damage Lost, complicate Westworld beyond repair, and create divisions within the Star Wars fandom. The principle sounds compelling: mysteries generate engagement, and answering questions creates new questions, sustaining interest indefinitely.
But I’ve observed a fundamental flaw in this approach through my analysis of dozens of franchises. Mystery Box narratives privilege secrecy over coherent storytelling. The writers of Lost eventually admitted they never intended to solve every question, leaving story threads that didn’t resolve in logically or emotionally satisfying ways. I watched fan communities transform from engaged audiences into frustrated detectives, exhausted by accumulating unanswered questions.
I’m witnessing this exact pattern with Stranger Things. The Season 5 finale left fans with more questions than anticipated, and despite a 40-minute epilogue designed to tie up loose ends, major story aspects remained unresolved. The show has developed one of the most convoluted, lore-rich plots on television. Some fans reported needing to have seen the stage play to understand key Season 5 elements—a troubling sign of franchise over-expansion.
This creates a vicious cycle I’ve documented across multiple properties: fans demand answers, creators provide prequels and expanded content, but the explanations feel less satisfying than the original mystery. Then fans demand more explanations to address problems created by previous revelations, and the cycle continues until the narrative collapses under its own weight.
What My Horror Analysis Has Taught Me
Through years of analyzing horror narratives for my work, I’ve identified a specific principle that the most enduring scary stories follow: they hint at things but leave crucial elements to imagination. The writer should know everything and give the horror internal logic, no matter how twisted, but then let readers or viewers encounter it through characters’ uncertainty and gradual, creeping knowledge.
I often cite SCP-447 as a perfect example—a famous internet horror story that remains terrifying despite being just paragraphs long. It establishes that a certain substance must never contact dead bodies but never explains what happens if it does. That gap is where the real horror lives. Readers fill it with their own worst fears, making the story personally terrifying in ways the author couldn’t predict.
The Demogorgon in Season 1 employed this technique masterfully. We didn’t fully understand its nature, origin, or motivations. By Season 4, however, we learned that Vecna essentially created or controlled these creatures, that the Mind Flayer might be his creation, and that the entire Upside Down possibly exists because of him. The incomprehensible cosmic horror became something with clear origins and motivations. Some fans have argued that Vecna’s introduction ruined what Stranger Things was, and based on my narrative analysis, I’m inclined to agree.
My Recommendation Moving Forward
Having invested years in understanding why mystery narratives succeed or fail, my conclusion is unambiguous: Hawkins Laboratory works best as an ominous presence with documented atrocities but unexplained depths. The more we illuminate every corner of its history, the more we risk transforming genuine horror into historical documentation.
The First Shadow has already pushed closer to that threshold than I’m comfortable with. Another prequel focusing specifically on the lab’s early days could cross it entirely, leaving us with a franchise rich in lore but poor in genuine mystery—all answers, no questions, and ultimately, no real terror.
The best horror, I’ve learned through years of professional analysis, is the horror we’re allowed to imagine for ourselves. Any lab prequel that forgets this fundamental truth risks killing the very mystery that made Stranger Things a cultural phenomenon.
Check out It’s Netflix Nerd for our latest reviews, ending explanations, and recommendations.